
Course Objectives
This clinical video presentation evaluates the importance and success of Wol-Ceram restorations in general practice and examines the fundamentals that must be mastered to achieve optimum results. Practitioners that complete the presentation will know the following:
Summary
During the last 15 years, all-ceramic restorations have increased in popularity as an
restorations probably account for approximately twenty-five percent of the 50,000,000
last year. Even with fifteen years of regular service, there still are aspects of all-ceramic
be improved. To produce optimum all-ceramic restorations, it is necessary for dentist
closely and communicate accurately via the impression and shade information.
All-ceramic tooth preparations require approximately 1.5 to 2.0 mm of reduction on all surfaces except for Wol-Ceram
which can prepared with a feather-edge margin. Strategically placed cuts at these specific depths are quite beneficial in
assuring that proper reduction has been accomplished. Without proper reduction, the longevity and overall esthetics of
all-ceramic restorations will be negatively affected.
All-ceramic impressions need to be as accurate as possible (a national laboratory association reports that 90% of
impressions for full crowns do not include all tooth preparation margins around the entire periphery of the tooth).
Provisional restorations need to replicate the morphology of the original tooth or the diagnostic wax-up in order to
retain the proper positions of the adjacent and opposing teeth.
Modern ceramics have excellent strength and esthetic characteristics when they are fired no more than 1.5 to 2 mm thick.
Porcelain fracture is likely to occur when porcelain is fired thicker than 2.0 mm. Resin reinforced glass ionomers are the
most popular cements used today because they are easy to use, strong, relatively insoluble, fluoride releasing and they
bond to tooth structure.
CAUTION: When viewing the techniques, procedures, theories and materials that are presented, you must make your own
decisions about specific treatment for patients and exercise personal professional judgement regarding the need for further
clinical testing or education and your own clinical expertise before trying to implement new procedures.
References
Probster L. Survival rate of In-Ceram restorations. Int J Prosthedont 2003;6(3):259-63.
Pang SE. A report of anterior In-Ceram restorations. Ann Acad Med Singapore
1995; 24(1): 33-7.
Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Corrado M. Clinical experience with In-Ceram Spinell
crowns: 5-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22(6):525-33
McLaren EA, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram Crowns in a private practice:
a prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83(2):216-22
Scotti R, Catapano S, D’Elia A. A clinical evaluation of In-Ceram crowns.
Int J Prosthodont 1995;8(4);320-3.
Olsson KG, Furst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE. A long-term retrospective and clinical
follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthedont 2003;16(2):150-6.
McLaren EA. All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic
restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19(3):307-8, 310, 312 passim.